supervisor: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
is work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(manager, is work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(administrator, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(manager, is work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(manager, is work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(technician, is work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(manager, is work)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(worker, has state job)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(technician, is work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technician, is work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(supervisor, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(supervisor, is work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(supervisor, is work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(supervisor, is work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, is work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(manager, is work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(technician, is work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(manager, is work)