supplier: appraisal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vendor
Weight: 0.61
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macromedia
Weight: 0.42
, distributor
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, seller
Weight: 0.33
, shipper
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
appraisal 1.00
evaluation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(supplier, appraisal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(supplier, evaluation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(supplier, evaluation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, evaluation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(supplier, evaluation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(supplier, appraisal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(supplier, appraisal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(supplier, appraisal)