supplier: be important lead time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vendor
Weight: 0.61
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macromedia
Weight: 0.42
, distributor
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, seller
Weight: 0.33
, shipper
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important lead time 1.00
be important time 0.85
need lead generation 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(software company, need lead generation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(software company, need lead generation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(software company, need lead generation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(supplier, be important lead time)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(supplier, be important time)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(supplier, be important time)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(supplier, be important time)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be important time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be important lead time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supplier, be important lead time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be important lead time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(software company, need lead generation)