supply: affect value of labor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.56
, consideration
Weight: 0.56
Siblings demand
Weight: 0.34
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, water plant
Weight: 0.32
, capacity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect value of labor 1.00
has quality cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(water plant, has quality cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supply, affect value of labor)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(supply, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality cost)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect value of labor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(supply, affect value of labor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect value of labor)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(water plant, has quality cost)