supply: be cause mineral become

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.56
, consideration
Weight: 0.56
Siblings demand
Weight: 0.34
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, water plant
Weight: 0.32
, capacity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cause mineral become 1.00
cause mineral can become 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(demand, be cause mineral become)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(demand, cause mineral can become)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(demand, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be cause mineral become)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(demand, cause mineral can become)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(demand, cause mineral can become)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(supply, be cause mineral become)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(supply, cause mineral can become)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(supply, cause mineral can become)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(supply, cause mineral can become)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(supply, cause mineral can become)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(supply, be cause mineral become)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(demand, be cause mineral become)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(supply, be cause mineral become)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(demand, cause mineral can become)