supply: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.56
, consideration
Weight: 0.56
Siblings demand
Weight: 0.34
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, water plant
Weight: 0.32
, capacity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
be equal to cost 0.82
is marginal cost 0.82
be equal to marginal cost 0.78
was for minning expensive 0.78
is expensive 0.77
affect value of labor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water plant, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(water plant, has quality cost)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water plant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(water plant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(supply, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(supply, is marginal cost)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(supply, be equal to cost)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(supply, is marginal cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(supply, is marginal cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supply, affect value of labor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(supply, affect value of labor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(supply, is marginal cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(supply, affect value of labor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect value of labor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(water plant, has quality cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(water plant, is expensive)