support: be viewed as role

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.57
, extension
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings strength
Weight: 0.32
, contribution
Weight: 0.32
, attention
Weight: 0.31
, vote
Weight: 0.31
, motivation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be viewed as role 1.00
be viewed as inferior role 0.91
is bot-lane role 0.88
is un-enjoyable role 0.88
is most un-enjoyable role 0.88
is popular role 0.86
has quality role 0.84
is hated role 0.84
is rate role 0.82
is unpopular role 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(support, be viewed as role)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(support, be viewed as inferior role)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(support, be viewed as inferior role)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(support, be viewed as inferior role)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(support, is unpopular role)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(support, is popular role)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(support, is unpopular role)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(support, is unpopular role)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(support, be viewed as inferior role)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(support, is popular role)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(support, is popular role)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(support, is unpopular role)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(support, is popular role)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(support, be viewed as role)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(support, be viewed as role)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(support, be viewed as role)