supreme court: appointment of is judges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
appointment of is judges 1.00
is justices lifetime appointment 0.87
appointment of is source 0.84
is lifetime appointment 0.82
has nine judges 0.81
need life appointments 0.80
be granted lifetime appointment 0.79
be decided by juries of judges 0.79
be appointed 0.77
is appointed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(court case, be decided by juries of judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(court, has nine judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(judge, is appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(judge, is appointed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(court, appointment of is judges)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(court, has nine judges)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(court case, be decided by juries of judges)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(court case, be decided by juries of judges)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(court, has nine judges)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(judge, is appointed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(court case, be decided by juries of judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(court, has nine judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(judge, is appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is justices lifetime appointment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(supreme court, is justices lifetime appointment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(supreme court, is justices lifetime appointment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is justices lifetime appointment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(supreme court, has nine judges)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, has nine judges)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(supreme court, has nine judges)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(supreme court, has nine judges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(judge, is appointed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(court, appointment of is judges)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court case, be decided by juries of judges)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(court, has nine judges)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(judge, is appointed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(court, appointment of is judges)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court case, be decided by juries of judges)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(court, has nine judges)