supreme court: avoid political questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
avoid political questions 1.00
avoid questions 0.92
is political 0.83
be considered political institutions 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(court, be considered political institutions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(court, be considered political institutions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, be considered political institutions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(court, be considered political institutions)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(supreme court, avoid political questions)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(supreme court, is political)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(supreme court, avoid questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is political)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(supreme court, avoid questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(supreme court, avoid questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, avoid questions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(supreme court, is political)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is political)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(court, be considered political institutions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(supreme court, avoid political questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(court, be considered political institutions)