supreme court: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be involved in cases concerning 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(court, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(supreme court, be related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(supreme court, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(court, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(court, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(court, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(supreme court, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(supreme court, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(supreme court, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(supreme court, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(court, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(court, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(supreme court, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)