supreme court: challenge actions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
challenge actions 1.00
challenge actions of executive agencies 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(supreme court, challenge actions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(supreme court, challenge actions)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(supreme court, challenge actions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(supreme court, challenge actions)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)