supreme court: is lifetime position

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is lifetime position 1.00
is lifetime 0.91
get lifetime tenure 0.86
enjoy lifetime tenure 0.86
is lifetime appointment 0.83
is position 0.82
is justice lifetime 0.82
is judge lifetime 0.81
have lifetime appointments 0.80
be granted lifetime appointment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(judge, have lifetime appointments)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(judge, have lifetime appointments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, have lifetime appointments)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(judge, have lifetime appointments)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(supreme court, is lifetime)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is justice lifetime)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is justice lifetime)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(supreme court, is justice lifetime)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is judge lifetime)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime appointment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(supreme court, is justice lifetime)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(supreme court, is judge lifetime)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is judge lifetime)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(supreme court, is judge lifetime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(judge, have lifetime appointments)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(supreme court, is lifetime position)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(judge, have lifetime appointments)