supreme court: is too powerful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is too powerful 1.00
is powerful 0.89
is very important 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tribunal, is very important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(supreme court, is too powerful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tribunal, is very important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tribunal, is very important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tribunal, is very important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is too powerful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(supreme court, is too powerful)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(supreme court, is powerful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(supreme court, is powerful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(supreme court, is powerful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is powerful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is too powerful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(supreme court, is too powerful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tribunal, is very important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(supreme court, is too powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tribunal, is very important)