surface: be suitable for fridge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.64
, tablet
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, configuration
Weight: 0.59
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.71
, substrate
Weight: 0.69
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.67
, clay
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be suitable for fridge 1.00
be suitable for fridge-freezer 0.87
be suitable making 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(clay, be suitable making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(clay, be suitable making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clay, be suitable making)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(surface, be suitable for fridge)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(surface, be suitable for fridge-freezer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(surface, be suitable for fridge-freezer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(surface, be suitable for fridge-freezer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(surface, be suitable for fridge-freezer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(surface, be suitable for fridge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(surface, be suitable for fridge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(surface, be suitable for fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(clay, be suitable making)