surgery: was dangerous at start

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was dangerous at start 1.00
was dangerous at start of century 0.88
was dangerous at start of 19th century 0.88
is dangerous 0.85
was good 0.79
be dangerous for adults 0.77
be more dangerous for adults 0.77
take place at night 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(surgery, take place at night)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(surgery, take place at night)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(surgery, take place at night)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(surgery, take place at night)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(surgery, was good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(surgery, was good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(surgery, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)