surgery: was important in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in middle ages 1.00
was important in ages 0.95
be dangerous for adults 0.81
be more dangerous for adults 0.80
hurt in adults 0.80
hurt in more adults 0.79
be more painful for adults 0.78
be worse for adults 0.77
be bad for teens 0.77
be harder on adults 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be bad for teens)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be worse for adults)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be harder on adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more painful for adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, hurt in more adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, hurt in adults)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be bad for teens)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be bad for teens)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, hurt in adults)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, hurt in adults)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, hurt in more adults)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, hurt in more adults)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be harder on adults)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be harder on adults)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be worse for adults)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be worse for adults)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more painful for adults)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be more painful for adults)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(surgery, was important in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(surgery, was important in ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surgery, was important in ages)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(surgery, was important in ages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(surgery, was important in middle ages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be bad for teens)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be harder on adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be worse for adults)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be more painful for adults)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, hurt in adults)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, hurt in more adults)