surveillance: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
, intrusion
Weight: 0.60
, mission
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reconnaissance
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.32
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, observation
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
is okay 0.81
be bad in bulgaria 0.79
is goddamn hard 0.79
be good for business 0.79
has quality good 0.78
is good method 0.77
need access to odd things 0.76
be like ridejoy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(application, need access to odd things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(application, need access to odd things)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(application, need access to odd things)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(escort service, is okay)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(observation, is good method)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is good thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is good thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(application, need access to odd things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(security system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(escort service, is okay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(escort service, is okay)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(observation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(observation, is good method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(observation, is good method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(surveillance, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(surveillance, is thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(surveillance, is thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(surveillance, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(surveillance, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(surveillance, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(surveillance, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(application, need access to odd things)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(escort service, is okay)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(observation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(observation, is good method)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(application, need access to odd things)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(surveillance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)