survival: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mode
Weight: 0.62
, trait
Weight: 0.61
, goal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings human life
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.31
, immune response
Weight: 0.31
, condition
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(human life, be in desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(human life, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(human life, be in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(survival, be in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(survival, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(survival, be in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(survival, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(human life, be in desert)