survivor: be in underwear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, family member
Weight: 0.59
, reality
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jin
Weight: 0.38
, dead person
Weight: 0.35
, tris
Weight: 0.34
, victim
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in underwear 1.00
wear underwear 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(survivor, be in underwear)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(survivor, wear underwear)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(survivor, wear underwear)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(survivor, wear underwear)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(survivor, wear underwear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(survivor, be in underwear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(survivor, be in underwear)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(survivor, be in underwear)