suspension: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sanction
Weight: 0.75
, punishment
Weight: 0.72
, penalty
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dismissal
Weight: 0.37
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.36
, ban
Weight: 0.36
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.35
, sentence
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be more stable than solutions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sanction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(penalty, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sanction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(suspension, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(suspension, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(suspension, be more stable than solutions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(suspension, be more stable than solutions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(suspension, be more stable than solutions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(suspension, be more stable than solutions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(suspension, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(suspension, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)