swallow: has physical part zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.60
, bird
Weight: 0.58
, eating
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.41
, songbird
Weight: 0.40
Siblings poison ivy
Weight: 0.31
, crow
Weight: 0.31
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.31
, hawk
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zone 1.00
has physical part wings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(swallow, has physical part zone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(swallow, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(swallow, has physical part zone)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(swallow, has physical part wings)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(swallow, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(swallow, has physical part wings)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(swallow, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(swallow, has physical part zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(swallow, has physical part zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(swallow, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)