swamp: be at wetland

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wetland 1.00
be habitat for fish 0.83
be at lake 0.80
be used to wildlife 0.79
be at forest 0.76
be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control 0.76
be at flat grassland 0.76
be at pond 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swamp, be at wetland)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swamp, be at wetland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at pond)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at wetland)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marsh, be used to wildlife)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marsh, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pond, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pond, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(swamp, be at wetland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swamp, be at wetland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(marsh, be at forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pond, be at forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(swamp, be at wetland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)