swamp: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, ditch
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality use 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(swamp, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality use)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality use)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(swamp, has quality use)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(swamp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality bad)