swan: has physical part necks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, fowl
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mute swan
Weight: 0.57
, trumpeter swan
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part necks 1.00
have long necks 0.93
has physical part neck 0.86
have skinny neck 0.79
have black beaks 0.77
have red beaks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part neck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(heron, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part necks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heron, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(heron, have long necks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(heron, has physical part neck)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part neck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(swan, has physical part necks)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(swan, has physical part neck)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(swan, has physical part neck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part neck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(swan, has physical part neck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(swan, have skinny neck)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(swan, have skinny neck)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swan, have long necks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swan, have skinny neck)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(swan, have skinny neck)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(swan, have long necks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(swan, have long necks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(swan, have long necks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(swan, has physical part necks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part neck)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part necks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(heron, have long necks)