sweet potato: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be good for babies 0.77
go bad 0.77
be considered bad 0.75
take out smell of skunk 0.75
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(onion ring, go bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(onion ring, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, be considered bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, take out smell of skunk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(onion ring, go bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato salad, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(potato salad, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato juice, take out smell of skunk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, take out smell of skunk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pear, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for babies)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(potato salad, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(potato salad, be considered bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(onion ring, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pear, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(potato salad, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tomato juice, take out smell of skunk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(potato salad, be considered bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(onion ring, go bad)