sweet potato: be better than regular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than regular 1.00
be better than white 0.82
be better than eating 0.82
is better next day 0.82
has quality better 0.80
be healthier than white 0.78
be better than ordinary potato 0.77
be better than meat 0.77
be actually different 0.76
be better than fruits 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flavor, be actually different)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(vegetable, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be better than meat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(flavor, be actually different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be better than meat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be actually different)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, is better next day)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flavor, be actually different)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(vegetable, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tomato sauce, is better next day)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, is better next day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than meat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(flavor, be actually different)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, is better next day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than meat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(flavor, be actually different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)