sweet potato: be good for diabetics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for diabetics 1.00
be better for diabetics 0.98
be bad for kidney disease 0.77
be good for diet 0.77
be good for dieting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for diet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diet)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pear, be good for diabetics)