sweet potato: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
seem more difficult 0.80
is infinitely less tasty 0.80
is are more popular than cameras 0.78
is god expensive 0.77
be expensive in america 0.76
is less tasty 0.76
be more important than fruit 0.76
be expensive in japan 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(onion ring, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vegetable, be more important than fruit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flavor, is god expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(flavor, is god expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be more important than fruit)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(onion ring, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(flavor, is god expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be more important than fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(onion ring, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vegetable, be more important than fruit)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flavor, is god expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sweet potato, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(onion ring, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(flavor, is god expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vegetable, be more important than fruit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(flavor, is god expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(onion ring, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(sweet potato, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vegetable, be more important than fruit)