swelling: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.70
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, sign
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings chest pain
Weight: 0.36
, dislocation
Weight: 0.35
, fracture
Weight: 0.35
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.35
, knee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is really bad 0.83
is bad people 0.80
feel good 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chest pain, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chest pain, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fracture, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chest pain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chest pain, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chest pain, feel good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(chest pain, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(swelling, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(swelling, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(swelling, has quality questions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chest pain, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chest pain, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(swelling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)