switch: be called intelligent hub

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light switch
Weight: 0.82
, feature
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, combination
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toggle
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, screen saver
Weight: 0.32
, use computer
Weight: 0.32
, introduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called intelligent hub 1.00
be faster than hub 0.83
be preferable to hub in ethernet network 0.81
be better than hubs 0.79
be more secure than hubs 0.79
is gateway 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(switch, be faster than hub)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(switch, be faster than hub)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(switch, be better than hubs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(switch, be better than hubs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(switch, be faster than hub)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(switch, be better than hubs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(switch, be better than hubs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(switch, be faster than hub)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)