switch: be more secure than hubs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light switch
Weight: 0.82
, feature
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, combination
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toggle
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, screen saver
Weight: 0.32
, use computer
Weight: 0.32
, introduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more secure than hubs 1.00
be better than hubs 0.94
be faster than hub 0.86
be preferable to hub in ethernet network 0.81
be called intelligent hub 0.79
is gateway 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(switch, be better than hubs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(switch, be better than hubs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(switch, be faster than hub)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(switch, be better than hubs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(switch, be better than hubs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(switch, be faster than hub)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(switch, be faster than hub)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(switch, be faster than hub)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)