switch: be needed in network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light switch
Weight: 0.82
, feature
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, combination
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toggle
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, screen saver
Weight: 0.32
, use computer
Weight: 0.32
, introduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in network 1.00
is needed 0.82
be preferable to hub in ethernet network 0.80
maximize overall network bandwidth 0.79
need systems 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, need systems)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(switch, be needed in network)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(electronic device, need systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, need systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, need systems)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(switch, be needed in network)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer network, is needed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(computer network, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(switch, be needed in network)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(switch, be needed in network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, need systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(computer network, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(switch, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, need systems)