switzerland: be better than nepal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.66
, europe
Weight: 0.62
, japan
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, world
Weight: 0.59
Siblings finland
Weight: 0.53
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, poland
Weight: 0.36
, italy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than nepal 1.00
be better than america 0.83
be much more successful than rest of europe 0.79
be colder than sudan 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(switzerland, be better than nepal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(switzerland, be better than america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be colder than sudan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be better than america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(switzerland, be better than america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(switzerland, be colder than sudan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(switzerland, be better than america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(switzerland, be colder than sudan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(switzerland, be colder than sudan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be better than nepal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(switzerland, be better than nepal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(switzerland, be better than nepal)