switzerland: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.66
, europe
Weight: 0.62
, japan
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, world
Weight: 0.59
Siblings finland
Weight: 0.53
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, poland
Weight: 0.36
, italy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is too expensive 0.89
be much more successful than rest 0.81
be much more successful than rest of europe 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(japan, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(world, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(world, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(japan, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(world, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(japan, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(finland, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(japan, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(world, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(finland, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(finland, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is too expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(switzerland, is too expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is too expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(switzerland, is too expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switzerland, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(switzerland, be much more successful than rest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(switzerland, be much more successful than rest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(switzerland, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be much more successful than rest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(switzerland, be much more successful than rest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, be much more successful than rest of europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(world, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(japan, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(finland, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(world, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(switzerland, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(japan, is expensive)