sword: be found in rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.62
, artifact
Weight: 0.61
, blade
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gladiator
Weight: 0.54
, rapier
Weight: 0.53
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.36
, spear
Weight: 0.35
, knife
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be found in rivers 1.00
appear in lake 0.82
were deposited in lakes 0.80
be found 0.76
be preserved in ponds 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(artifact, be preserved in ponds)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(artifact, be found)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sword, be found in rivers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(artifact, be found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(artifact, be preserved in ponds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be preserved in ponds)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be found)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(artifact, be preserved in ponds)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(artifact, be found)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sword, be found in rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sword, were deposited in lakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(sword, were deposited in lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sword, were deposited in lakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sword, appear in lake)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sword, appear in lake)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sword, were deposited in lakes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(sword, appear in lake)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sword, appear in lake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sword, be found in rivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(artifact, be found)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(artifact, be preserved in ponds)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(artifact, be found)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sword, be found in rivers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(artifact, be preserved in ponds)