syntax: be important in technical writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, detail
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings programming language
Weight: 0.67
, annotation
Weight: 0.33
, boolean logic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33
, filename
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in technical writing 1.00
be important in writing 0.87
be important in piece writing 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in writing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in writing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)