synthesis: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.63
, design
Weight: 0.56
, method
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hybridization
Weight: 0.34
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.33
, ontology
Weight: 0.33
, replication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
be used in research paper 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ontology, be important in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ontology, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ontology, be important in research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(synthesis, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(synthesis, be used in research paper)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(synthesis, be used in research paper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(synthesis, be used in research paper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be used in research paper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ontology, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(synthesis, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)