syphilis: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.70
, illness
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.37
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.37
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.37
, hepatitis
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is growing problem 0.84
has state concern 0.84
is global health problem 0.82
were such problem during war 0.79
is issue 0.78
be issue 0.77
is health issue 0.76
has state disorder 0.76
has state complex 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(infection, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(illness, is growing problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(infection, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(illness, is growing problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is global health problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, be issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tuberculosis, is global health problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is global health problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gonorrhea, be issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, be issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(syphilis, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(syphilis, has state concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state concern)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, be issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is global health problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(syphilis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)