syrup: have refrigerated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sugar
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
, liquid
Weight: 0.57
Siblings maple syrup
Weight: 0.79
, honey
Weight: 0.62
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.35
, lime juice
Weight: 0.35
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have refrigerated 1.00
is refrigerated 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, have refrigerated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, is refrigerated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple syrup, is refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, is refrigerated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(maple syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, have refrigerated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(syrup, have refrigerated)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(syrup, is refrigerated)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(syrup, is refrigerated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(syrup, is refrigerated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(syrup, is refrigerated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(syrup, have refrigerated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(maple syrup, is refrigerated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(syrup, have refrigerated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maple syrup, have refrigerated)