system: be described as interrupt driven software

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.72
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.64
, free software
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.62
, transformer
Weight: 0.62
, terminal server
Weight: 0.61
, prism
Weight: 0.60
, radar
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as interrupt driven software 1.00
be recognized on computer networks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be described as interrupt driven software)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(system, be described as interrupt driven software)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(system, be described as interrupt driven software)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(system, be described as interrupt driven software)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be described as interrupt driven software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(system, be described as interrupt driven software)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)