system: be important in computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.72
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.64
, free software
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.62
, transformer
Weight: 0.62
, terminal server
Weight: 0.61
, prism
Weight: 0.60
, radar
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer 1.00
be important to computer system 0.94
be important to computer security 0.90
be connected to computer 0.88
be recognized on computer networks 0.81
be important in technology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hvac, be important to computer security)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(system, be important in computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(system, be important in computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(system, be important in computer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(system, be important in computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(hvac, be important to computer security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hvac, be important to computer security)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(system, be important in computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(system, be important in computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hvac, be important to computer security)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(system, be important in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)