system: be related to economic development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.72
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.64
, free software
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.62
, transformer
Weight: 0.62
, terminal server
Weight: 0.61
, prism
Weight: 0.60
, radar
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to economic development 1.00
be related 0.77
is related 0.77
be important in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(structure, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(system, be related to economic development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(structure, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(prism, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(structure, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(system, be related to economic development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(prism, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prism, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(system, be related to economic development)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(system, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(system, be related)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(system, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(system, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(system, be related to economic development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(structure, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prism, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(system, be related to economic development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(structure, be related)