tab: be more expensive for cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, key
Weight: 0.56
Siblings window pane
Weight: 0.33
, rear window
Weight: 0.33
, folder
Weight: 0.32
, front door
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive for cars 1.00
be more expensive for newer cars 0.93
is expensive 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(window, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(front door, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(front door, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(front door, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tab, be more expensive for cars)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tab, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tab, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tab, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tab, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(front door, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)