table tennis: be played indoor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis
Weight: 0.75
, basketball
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.68
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, badminton
Weight: 0.65
Siblings tennis game
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.37
, chess game
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played indoor 1.00
is indoor game 0.94
be played 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(badminton, is indoor game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(basketball, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(badminton, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(badminton, be played)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(badminton, is indoor game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(basketball, be played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is indoor game)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(basketball, be played)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(badminton, is indoor game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(basketball, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(badminton, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(table tennis, be played indoor)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(table tennis, be played)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played indoor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(badminton, be played)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(badminton, is indoor game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(basketball, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(badminton, be played)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(badminton, is indoor game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(table tennis, be played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(basketball, be played)