table: be at internet cafe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet cafe 1.00
be at cafe 0.93
be at in restaurant 0.76
be at fast-food restaurant 0.76
be at restaurant 0.76
be find in restaurant 0.76
be at shop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at shop)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(food, be at shop)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at shop)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(table, be at internet cafe)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be at cafe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(table, be at cafe)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(table, be at in restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(table, be at cafe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at in restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(table, be at cafe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(table, be at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(table, be at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(table, be at in restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(table, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(table, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(table, be at internet cafe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(food, be at shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(table, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(food, be at shop)