table: be better than graphs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hash table
Weight: 0.76
, dining room
Weight: 0.65
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, dining table
Weight: 0.74
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, table saw
Weight: 0.64
, sofa
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than graphs 1.00
be used in maps 0.75
be better than real life 0.75
is used in maps 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sign, is used in maps)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(table, be better than graphs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sign, be used in maps)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(table, be better than graphs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sign, be used in maps)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sign, is used in maps)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sign, is used in maps)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sign, be used in maps)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sign, is used in maps)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(table, be better than graphs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sign, be used in maps)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(table, be better than graphs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(table, be better than graphs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(table, be better than graphs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sign, be used in maps)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sign, is used in maps)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sign, be used in maps)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(table, be better than graphs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sign, is used in maps)