table: have four legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hash table
Weight: 0.76
, dining room
Weight: 0.65
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, dining table
Weight: 0.74
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, table saw
Weight: 0.64
, sofa
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
have four legs 1.00
have 4 legs 0.92
has physical part legs 0.86
have metal legs 0.83
walking is on toes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sign, walking is on toes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(table, have four legs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sign, walking is on toes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sign, walking is on toes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dining table, have four legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sofa, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sign, walking is on toes)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(table, have four legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(dining table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dining table, have four legs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sofa, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sofa, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(table, have four legs)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(table, has physical part legs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(table, have metal legs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(table, have metal legs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(table, have metal legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(table, have metal legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(table, have 4 legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(table, has physical part legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(table, have 4 legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(table, have 4 legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(table, have 4 legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(table, has physical part legs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(table, has physical part legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(table, have four legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sign, walking is on toes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dining table, have four legs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sofa, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(table, have four legs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sign, walking is on toes)