tablet: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be bad for us 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be good for society 0.79
be essential for healthy economy 0.78
be good for education 0.78
has quality bad 0.76
be essential for economy 0.76
be key prices over all shop 0.75
be important part of economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(market, be essential for healthy economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(market, be important part of economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(market, be essential for healthy economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(market, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(market, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(market, be important part of economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(market, be essential for healthy economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(market, be important part of economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be good for education)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be good for society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(market, be essential for healthy economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(market, be important part of economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(smartphone, be good for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be good for society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(smartphone, be good for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be good for education)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tablet, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tablet, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(market, be essential for healthy economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(market, be important part of economy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(smartphone, be good for society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(smartphone, be good for education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(market, be essential for healthy economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(market, be important part of economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tablet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)