tablet: be in mode

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mode 1.00
be in hard mode 0.94
be in safe mode 0.90
be in airplane mode 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(device, be in airplane mode)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tablet, be in mode)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(device, be in airplane mode)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(device, be in airplane mode)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(device, be in airplane mode)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tablet, be in mode)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tablet, be in mode)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in hard mode)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in safe mode)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tablet, be in hard mode)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tablet, be in hard mode)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tablet, be in safe mode)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tablet, be in hard mode)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet, be in safe mode)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tablet, be in safe mode)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tablet, be in mode)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(device, be in airplane mode)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(tablet, be in mode)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(device, be in airplane mode)