tablet: be more expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in canada 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.98
be more expensive than usa 0.91
be expensive in australia 0.90
be more expensive than than tv 0.82
be in uk work 0.82
be in uk 0.81
get more expensive 0.80
be in uk competitive 0.79
get expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mobile phone, be in uk work)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(market, be in uk competitive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(market, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(market, be in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(market, be in uk competitive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be in uk work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(market, be in uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(market, be in uk competitive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be in uk work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mobile phone, be in uk work)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(market, be in uk competitive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(market, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tablet, be more expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than usa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive than usa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tablet, be more expensive than usa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(market, be in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(market, be in uk competitive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be in uk work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(market, be in uk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(market, be in uk competitive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(tablet, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be in uk work)